1
siteground vs wpengine

Choosing the right hosting provider for your website can be tricky, there are dozens of factors to consider, like uptime, price, speed, security or support.

And, Spoiler Alert!, choosing between SiteGround or WP Engine will be hard, both are great hosts.

I’ve been using both for years on a daily basis, so let me share my experience with you whilst getting into their pros, cons and (hidden?) fees.

WP Engine vs SiteGround: An overview

SiteGround is more affordable than WP Engine and it offers more storage options and bandwidth. WP Engine excels at uptime and its WordPress features are more refined, however, they have annoying sales reps. When it comes to performance both nail it.

However, there is one case where the choice is easy as pie: if you are looking to host a project that ISN’T on WordPress, SiteGround is the ultimate winner as WP Engine will only host WordPress.

Deciding on which host to choose for WordPress sites will be much harder, as you’ll learn in this SiteGround vs WP Engine guide.

To help you decide quickly, I’ve put together a table comparing both providers:

SiteGround WP Engine
Popularity High Medium
Ease of use Great Great
Hosting features A lot A lot
Uptime Very good Great
Speed Very good Very good
Server locations 4 10 +
Site migration Included Included in top plans
Scalability Very good Very good
Security Secure Secure
Support Very good Very good
Prices Medium-high High
Conclusion SiteGround’s performance is impressive. It comes with a lot of hosting features and responsive support. However, they are a bit more expensive. WP Engine is obviously a top hosting provider due to great uptime results, but it’s not a very affordable option.

SiteGround vs WP Engine – Which one is more popular?

SiteGround was founded in Bulgaria in 2004 and, at the time of writing this article, hosts over two million domain names and employs around 500 people. It’s also worth mentioning that WordPress themselves recommend (among other providers) SiteGround.

wordpress recommedns siteground

Founded a bit later (2010), WP Engine has made itself a good name among hard-core WordPress users. It has over 150,000 customers and it employs about 1,000 people – yup, twice as much as SiteGround. WP Engine made some headlines in 2019 when it acquired its direct competitor Flywheel – I guess they aren’t short for cash.

wpengine vs siteground

Google Trends comparison of SiteGround vs WP Engine

As you can see in the above image, SiteGround seems to be a fair bit more popular among users than WP Engine. That’s only normal as SiteGround appeals to a much broader audience due to its lower prices (more about this later on).

I know, host popularity doesn’t necessarily correlate with good service. There are plenty of examples of famous hosts (e.g. any EIG service) that aren’t actually that reliable.

Let’s keep exploring their features and performance to get a better idea of what each has to offer.

Round 1 – Ease of use: What is the easiest to use?

Since SiteGround has moved away from cPanel to its own dashboard, ease of use has improved a lot. Now the interface looks much cleaner and intuitive – I love cPanel but it looks pretty dated.

It’s now also possible to manage sites individually instead of having a global account to manage all the projects. This means that you can add users to your hosting account and only share the sites that are relevant to them. If you have clients, you can even have a white-label version of SiteGround’s admin panel.

Adding a user with SiteGround

WP Engine and SiteGround are on par when it comes to ease of use. WP Engine has its own system to manage the hosting account and the interface is nicely designed. One could argue that it’s even better than SiteGround’s as it’s a bit more flexible, no white label though.

Winner: Well, both have an easy-to-use and well-designed system. So both get a point.

Round 2 – Hosting features

When comparing website hosts, there are a bunch of features you should scrutinize and test before you decide on one. Let me do the heavy lifting for you here:

Available storage

Obviously, you will need to pick a web hosting plan with enough space for your project(s). Let’s check out how much each plan allows:

SiteGround WP Engine
Entry-level plan

10GB

1 site

10GB

1 site

Middle plan

20GB

Unlimited sites

20GB

10 sites

Higher plan

30GB

Unlimited sites

50GB

30 sites

As you can see, WP Engine and SiteGround offer similar storage for the entry-level plan and the medium plan. For the top tier packages, WP Engine is a bit more generous (it also costs about 10 x more).

The other thing to consider is that WP Engine limits the number of sites you can have on each plan, whereas SiteGround is a bit more flexible as unlimited websites are allowed for the medium and top tier plans.

Winner: Again, a close call, but SiteGround’s flexibility with the unlimited websites gives them an edge.

Bandwidth – How much traffic do they allow?

WP Engine didn’t stand a chance in this round. SiteGround is much more generous as it doesn’t meter the traffic to your sites.

wpengine bandwidth limitations

WP Engine bandwidth limitations

Sadly, WP Engine does come with traffic limitations for all plans (25,000, 100,000 and 400,000 visits a month). As we stated in our WP Engine pricing page, exceeding the allowed monthly visits can get pricey with WP Engine (about $1-2 dollars for every 1000 visitors). On that page you can also learn more about their Custom plans that allow 1m+ visitors.

Winner: Thanks to its generosity with the bandwidth, SiteGround scores another point.

Backups – Better be safe than sorry

Regularly backing up your website should be a priority. When things go south, being able to restore your website to a working version is priceless.

For this reason, I love WP Engine’s back up system. At WP Engine they’ll keep a daily backup for all your sites for 40 days. You can also create your own backups on-demand (e.g. before updating the plugin), plus, downloading backups and storing them locally is possible too.

SiteGround’s system is very similar (it stores them for about 30 days), the only downside is that you can only keep 5 on-demand backups for each site, and it’s not possible to download them.

Winner: Despite SiteGround offering more than the average shared host, WP Engine’s backup system is as good as it gets. A point to them.

Email accounts

With SiteGround you’ll be able to create as many email accounts as you need, but be aware that each account you create has a maximum storage allowance of 2GB, 4GB and 6GB, depending on whether you’re on the StartUp, GrowBig or GoGeek plan.

Sadly, WP Engine doesn’t even compete here as it doesn’t provide email.

Winner: Well, it’s pretty clear that SiteGround wins when it comes to email.

FTP, SFTP & SSH access

Another area where both providers perform well is the FTP accounts. Neither SiteGround nor WP Engine will limit the accounts you’ll be able to create. The only difference is that WP Engine will only allow you to use secure FTP (SFTP) and SiteGround will let you choose between regular FTP or secure FTP.

siteground ftp creation account

Managing FTP accounts with SiteGround

Though many developers think that FTP is a thing of the past, having SSH access is much more efficient when pushing code. No surprises here, as both hosting providers offer this feature out-of-the-box.

Winner: You guessed it, another draw, as both SiteGround and WP Engine are pretty reliable.

SSL & HTTP/2

Using SSL certificates and HTTP/2 will enhance security, I have to say these are standards these days – I would not use a host that doesn’t provide free SSL certificates and connection over HTTP/2.

WP Engine and SiteGround are top-quality services, so, as expected, both include these features.

On top of that, you can also install third-party SSL certificates from other providers if you don’t want to use (the complementary) Let’s Encrypt.

Winner: Again, we can’t pick a winner here as both offer top-notch options.

Git repos and staging areas

Larger teams may want a version control system via Git where they can combine their locally developed code with a shared development environment (e.g. staging areas) without crashing each other’s code.

That’s when you need Git.

Hats off to both, as not many providers offer pre-installed Git repos. The only thing to keep in mind is that SiteGround only offers this on its top-tier plan ($11.95 a month) whilst WP Engine offers this in the entry plan too ($25 a month).

wpengine git shh user

WP Engine Git and SSH key management

Additionally, creating a staging environment (a copy of your site to test the code) isn’t a problem with either of the providers. Be aware that this feature is not offered on the StartUp SiteGround plan.

Winner: This is an intense competition, both offer Git repositories and staging areas at similar prices so both deserve a point.

Cool, let’s recap and see who gets the point for having the best hosting features:

  • SiteGround won the rounds for: Storage, bandwidth and email.
  • WP Engine has an upper hand when it comes to backups.
  • The rest (Git, Staging, SFTP, SSL and HTTP/2) are pretty much equal in both providers.

Therefore, the overall point for this big Hosting features round goes to SiteGround due to the fact that they offer similar features at lower prices.

Round 3 – Downtime: Service interruptions

We’ve got several real websites (e.g. this one) hosted with both providers, and let me tell you, we’ve been happy with the uptime levels for both hosting providers for the last few years.

siteground vs wpengine uptime

WP Engine and SiteGround average uptime for 1 year

As you can see in the screenshot above, SiteGround’s uptime is extremely good (99.99% for the last year), but, at 100%, WP Engine’s it’s even better.

Winner: True, 0.01% is a small difference, but the effort resources and skills that go into achieving such levels give this point to WP Engine.

At the moment we have a tie at 2-2.

Round 4 – Better loading speed

When it comes to speed, everyone wants a hosting provider that shows some muscle. After all, faster websites provide better user experience and get more SEO love from search engines.

To help us figure out which provider is the faster solution, I created two identical demo sites and tested their speed from several locations. See the results below:

Test SiteGround WP Engine
Pingdom test 1

(DC)

0.82 s 0.57 s
Pingdom test 2

(Tokyo)

2.22 s 2.05 s
Pingdom test 3

(San Francisco)

0.79 s 0.68 s
GT Metrix test 1

(Dallas)

2.1 s 1.9 s
GT Metrix test 2

(London, UK)

1.4 s 1.9 s
GT Metrix test 3

(Vancouver, Canada)

1.5 s 1.5 s
Webtest page 1

(Ireland)

4.99 s 5.37 s
Webtest page 2

(Sydney)

5.61 s 5.71 s
Webtest page 3

(Chicago)

4.64 s 5.30 s
Average 2.67 s 2.77 s

Note: Be aware that WP Engine includes a CDN by default (MaxCDN), which will speed up your website world wide. SiteGround integrates with the CloudFlare CDN which has a free version, but if you need more options (e.g. extra security) you’ll need to purchase a paid version.

Winner: As you can see, WP Engine was faster in some locations (Dallas or DC), but then SiteGround overtook WP Engine in other locations. The average speed for the 9 rounds is pretty similar and under the 3-seconds mark for both. Therefore, both SiteGround and WP Engine get the speed point.

Check out some of the test results here:

Round 5 – Where are their servers located?

Having flexibility on where your website is hosted is more important than some may think. In other words, your website should ideally be hosted closer to your audience to favor loading speed.

siteground datacenters

With SiteGround and WP Engine, you have several options to host your website in several locations:

  • WP Engine: Iowa, South Carolina, Oregon and Montreal for North America; Belgium, London and Frankfurt for Europe; and Taiwan, Tokyo and Sindey for Asia-Pacific.
  • SiteGround: Chicago and Iowa in the US; London in the UK; Amsterdam and Eemshaven in the Netherlands; and Singapore in Asia.

One thing to take into account is that with WP Engine you can move individual sites to different servers. For example, you could have 1 website hosted in Iowa and another one in London. This is not possible with SiteGround, all your sites will be hosted under 1 account location.

Winner: Oh boy, WP Engine clearly bags this round.

Exciting! Right now WP Engine is in the lead with 4-3.

Round 6 – Website migration

Changing hosting providers can be a real pain; having to move files, databases and emails is a tedious chore when done manually. Luckily, here both WP Engine and SiteGround offer solutions that are sure to make your life easier.

When migrating a WordPress site, both SiteGround and WP Engine offer 2 options:

  • In-house developed WordPress plugin – DIY approach
  • Get one of their support members to migrate your website (with limitations)

siteground migration service

SiteGround’s site migration policy

With SiteGround you’ll get 1 migration for free (on the GrowBig plan or higher), after that, each migration will cost you $30.

WP Engine won’t offer migration services unless you are on a dedicated hosting plan, which won’t be cheap at all.

Winner: SiteGround offers a bit more for most users, so another point for them.

This leaves things pretty tight. Current score: 4-4.

Round 7 – Scalability

It’s important to have a hosting provider that can accommodate your project if it grows. Let’s see what SiteGround and WP Engine have to offer here.

With SiteGround you can get the following hosting services:

  • Shared hosting for small to medium websites (recommended up to 100,000 visitors a month). Prices start at $11.95 and go up to $34.95 a month.
  • If you need more resources, you can opt for a SiteGround Cloud Hosting plan which will let you add more processing power, storage and RAM memory. These start at $80 a month and go all the way up to $2,000 a month (includes 31 CPUs, 128 GB of RAM, 1TB of storage and 5 TB of bandwidth).
  • But if you need even more resources, you can contact SiteGround for a custom Enterprise solution. Be aware that it won’t be cheap.

siteground cloud hosting configuration

SiteGround custom cloud plans

And WP Engine offers:

  • Shared hosting plans that cost between $25 and $272 a month.
  • For power users, dedicated custom plans are available. These will cost you a minimum of $6,000 per year. They are good for sites with around 1million visitors a month.

Winner: This round is another tie. Both providers offer enough to accommodate really big sites.

Round 8 – Security features

As I mentioned earlier, both providers come with secure FTP, free SSL certificates and SSH connection. They also use the latest versions of PHP 7 and block brute force attacks  – no complaints here.

On top of that, both hosts keep an eye on WordPress security issues and are quite responsive in coming up with solutions. WP Engine even has a list of security-banned WordPress plugins it won’t let you install on your website.

Winner: My guess is that WP Engine can manage security more effectively since it only allows WordPress sites, however, I don’t have proof of that. Therefore, another point for both.

Round 9 – Available support

You can reach WP Engine via live chat, email or phone 24 hours a day. The support agents are friendly and knowledgeable. Sometimes I had to wait a bit, but it was never too long.

Similarly, SiteGround’s responsive and friendly support team can also be reached by phone, email or live chat 24 hours a day.

Though WP Engine support team is excellent, speaking to its sales reps is not a nice experience. They aren’t clear about the services on offer and all they want to do is jump on a call with you as soon as they can – sorry, I am not yet ready to commit.

wpengine annoying sales team

WP Engine sales rep not being clear about migrations in our chat

Winner: Thanks to the annoying WP Engine sales reps, SiteGround claims this round.

Round 10 – WordPress features

If you are considering WP Engine you will be naturally looking to host a WordPress site. Let me explore what cool features each provider offers for this CMS.

Feature SiteGround WP Engine
Easy install Yes Yes
Automatic system updates Possible Yes
Automatic plugin update Possible Paid add-on
In-house caching system

Yes

SG Optimize

Yes

WP Engine Caching

Staging area *

Yes

(GrowBig and GoGeek plans)

Yes

All plans

Migration plugins Yes Yes
Other features WordPress Starter plugin for beginners & speed optimization plugin (e.g. lazy load images) GeoIP for country-specific content (paid add-on)

Winner: Even if SiteGround offers as much, some of the WP Engine features (e.g. staging areas) are a bit more refined, so WP Engine get another point.

This is quite an intense battle. The providers are now neck and neck with 7 points each. Let’s see who wins the last round.

Round 11 – Plans & prices

Last but not least, let’s look at which one offers the better deal. Here is a summary of how much each charges for different services:

  SiteGround WP Engine
Entry level plan $11.95 / month $25 / month
Middle plan $19.95 / month $96 / month
Highest plan $34.95 / month $272 / month
Cloud hosting $80 / month N/A
Custom solution N/A $500 / month

As you can see, the most expensive shared plan with SiteGround will cost you as much as WP Engine’s cheapest. On top of that, unlike WP Engine, SiteGround doesn’t limit the bandwidth (visitors) you can receive on your site.

Winner: When looking at the price, SiteGround comes out victorious.

And the final score is 8-7 to SiteGround, what a match this one has been!

WP Engine or SiteGround: Which one shall I choose?

As we’ve seen, both SiteGround and WP Engine offer a lot of features (e.g. staging areas), good performance and outstanding support.

Of course, WP Engine offers a bit more in terms of uptime and some features are a bit more polished. But generally speaking, WP Engine is also between 2 to 7 times more expensive.

But is WP Engine 7 times better than SiteGround?

For me, the answer is no; SiteGround shared plans offers enough to host any (moderately) big WordPress site (e.g. up to 100,000 visitors a month). I would therefore advise you to consider SiteGround before you shell out hundreds of dollars on WP Engine – which I think is a bit overpriced.

If you have a larger site (e.g. all our projects combined receive over 500,000 visitors a month), I would advise you to either check out WP Engine’s plans or SiteGround’s cloud hosting service.

But, of course, remember that you have a 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee for both SiteGround and WP Engine, so you can use this period to test things out for yourself.

I hope you enjoyed reading this WP Engine vs SiteGround article. But please, if you have any questions concerning any of these providers, leave a comment below and I’ll gladly help you out.

Your comments

Back to top